πŸš› NC Truck Parking Analysis Dashboard

Interactive Facility Location Optimization & Demand Analysis

System-Wide Performance

44.9%

Total Unmet Demand

55.1%

Trucks Served

159

Total Facilities

Base Case Performance by Facility Type

Rest Areas

0.0%

Unmet Demand

Avg Util: nan

Truck Stops

44.9%

Unmet Demand

Avg Util: nan

πŸ“‹ About This Dashboard

This dashboard presents the results of a comprehensive truck parking facility location optimization study for North Carolina. The analysis evaluates the trade-offs between infrastructure costs and service quality (measured by unmet demand) across different numbers of new facilities (p = 1 to 50).

Interactive Facility Map

πŸ—ΊοΈ Map Controls & Visual Encoding

  • Major Corridors (Dark Grey): Shows I-26, I-40, I-77, I-95, and I-85
    • Line Thickness = Unmet Demand (p=20 scenario) - thicker lines indicate higher unmet demand after adding 20 new facilities
    • Hover over any segment to see which interstate it belongs to
    • Click on any segment for detailed statistics:
      • Interstate/highway name
      • Unmet demand (p=20) and percentage
  • New Facilities (p=20): πŸ›οΈ Rest Areas (purple bed icon) and ⬛ Truck Stops (purple square icon)
  • Other Scenarios: Use the layer control (top right) to toggle p=10, 30, 40, 50 scenarios
    • p=10: Blue markers
    • p=20: Purple markers (default shown)
    • p=30: Orange markers
    • p=40: Pink markers
    • p=50: Brown markers
  • Use fullscreen mode for better viewing
  • Zoom and pan to explore different regions
Make this Notebook Trusted to load map: File -> Trust Notebook

Parametric Analysis: Unmet Demand vs Cost

Facility Type Distribution

Cost Efficiency Analysis

πŸ“Š Interpretation Guide

Diminishing Returns: Notice how the unmet demand reduction rate decreases as more facilities are added. The first 20 facilities provide the most significant improvement.

Cost Trade-off: While adding facilities reduces unmet demand, the marginal benefit decreases while costs increase linearly.

Key Findings & Recommendations

🎯 Optimal Configuration

Based on the analysis, p=20 new facilities appears to be a cost-effective solution, providing substantial reduction in unmet demand while maintaining reasonable infrastructure costs.

πŸ“ˆ Performance Metrics

  • Base Case: Current system has significant unmet demand in both rest areas and truck stops
  • Facility Utilization: Existing facilities show high utilization rates, indicating capacity constraints
  • Geographic Distribution: Unmet demand is concentrated in high-traffic corridors (visible on map as thicker dark grey lines)

πŸ’‘ Strategic Recommendations

  1. Prioritize High-Demand Corridors: Focus new facilities on segments with highest unmet demand in the p=20 scenario (thicker dark grey lines on map indicate higher residual unmet demand after 20 facilities are added)
  2. Balanced Facility Mix: Maintain appropriate ratio of rest areas to truck stops based on demand patterns
  3. Phased Implementation: Consider implementing facilities in phases to manage costs and assess effectiveness
  4. Expansion Strategy: Expand existing facilities in parallel with new construction where feasible

πŸ”„ Next Steps

  • Conduct detailed site assessments for selected candidate locations
  • Evaluate environmental and regulatory considerations
  • Develop detailed cost estimates including land acquisition and construction
  • Establish monitoring framework to track performance post-implementation
  • Consider seasonal variations and future demand growth projections